I stayed up last night to watch President Mugabe’s live speech at the UN General Assembly meeting in New York (UNGA). The speech was predictable – we expected the traditional rant against the West; the castigation of sanctions, etc.
In many ways, President Mugabe speaks very passionately for the African continent, indeed for the small nations of the world – against the big boys on the international arena. He revels in that role and in recent years, isolated by the West, he has found it easier to throw the away the veil of diplomacy and does not hesitate to speak his mind, a circumstance that endears him so well to those who feel marginalised, the “other” of this world. For that, he has a large following on the African continent that regards him as a hero.
Few can seriously argue with his views on reform of the UN system. It’s something that matters to marginalised countries. Although other leaders share the same concerns, they are not always ready to speak out. However, Mugabe is always ready to stand up for them and speak his mind. The playground needs the fellow who, feeling there is nothing else to lose, stands up to the big boys.
Nevertheless, the irony of it all does not escape us. As I listened to him criticising unilateralism, castigating bullies and violent war-mongers on the international stage, I thought to myself, does President Mugabe realise when he complains about these things on the international stage that these are exactly the same things that his opponents at home complain of on the national stage?
Does it ever occur to the President that when he asks for multilateralism, cooperation, peace, decency and fairness, that is exactly what his opponents ask of him on the national stage; that the frustration that he feels and expresses so eloquently regarding the arrogance of his nemeses on the international stage is exactly the same frustration that his opponents feel and express so loudly regarding his party’s arrogance on the national stage?
Does it occur to him that when he exhorts the international community to adhere to the values and principles of the UN Charter that is exactly what his partners under the Global Political Agreement (GPA) ask of him regarding the need for respect of the principles and values of that agreement and the Constitution?
So I thought, let me do a quick exercise whereby his UN speech is placed in the national context, so that where he refers to the “United Nations” we refer to the “Government of Zimbabwe”; where he refers to the “international” we refer to the “national”; where he refers to the “global”we refer to the “local” and where he refers to the “UN Charter” we refer to the “Constitution” or the “GPA”. This could give us an alternative national speech, one unlike all he has delivered before but one that is probably the closest to reality. The table below serves that purpose. The first column captures what the President said to the UNGA and the second is the alternative speech – as it would read if it were made on the national stage:
| PRESIDENT MUGABE UNGA SPEECH
|
HOW IT WOULD READ ON THE NATIONAL STAGE |
| President Mugabe:
In the quest for a more just and equitable international order, Zimbabwe strongly opposed to unilateralism, is committed to multilateralism. We therefore would like to see a United Nations that continues to be a guarantor of world peace and security, and a bulwark in the fight for justice mad equality among nations.
|
The Alternative Speech:
In the quest for a more just and equitable national order, Zimbabweans are strongly opposed to unilateralism, are committed to multilateralism. We therefore would like to see a Government that continues to be a guarantor of national peace and security, and a bulwark in the fight for justice mad equality among people.
|
| President Mugabe:
Equally important, the United Nations must in future never allow itself to be abused by any member state or group of States that seeks to achieve parochial partisan goals. The Charter of the United Nations clearly stipulates it as an international body that should work for the good of all the peoples of the world.
|
The Alternative Speech:
Equally important, the Government must in future never allow itself to be abused by any party or group of parties that seek to achieve parochial partisan goals. The Constitution clearly stipulates it as an national body that should work for the good of all the peoples of Zimbabwe.
|
| President Mugabe:
We have noticed, with deep regret, that the provisions of the United Nations Charter dealing with the peaceful settlement of disputes, have, on occasion, been ignored by the Security Council. In contrast, there appears to be an insatiable appetite for war, embargos, sanctions and other punitive actions, even on matters that are better resolved through multilateral cooperation.
|
The Alternative Speech:
We have noticed, with deep regret, that the provisions of the GPA, have, on occasion, been ignored by the President and ZANU PF. In contrast, there appears to be an insatiable appetite for violence and other punitive actions, even on matters that are better resolved through multilateral cooperation.
|
| President Mugabe:
The warmongers of our world have done us enough harm. Wherever they have imposed themselves, chaos in place of peace has been the result.
|
The Alternative Speech:
The violence-mongers of our country have done us enough harm. Wherever they have imposed themselves, chaos in place of peace has been the result.
|
| President Mugabe:
For the international community to successfully deal with global economic, social, security and environmental challenges, the existence of international institutions to handle them and a culture of genuine multilateralism are critical. The United Nations, its specialised agencies, and international financial institutions, are the only instruments available for responding effectively to the global challenges we face in this global village. It is therefore critical that these structures are reformed, and realigned in response to both global challenges and our contemporary realities, in order to better serve our collective interests.
|
The Alternative Speech:
For the national community to successfully deal with national economic, social, security and environmental challenges, the existence of national institutions to handle them and a culture of genuine multilateralism are critical. The Government, its agencies and institutions are the only instruments available for responding effectively to the national challenges we face in this nation. It is therefore critical that these structures are reformed, and realigned in response to both national challenges and our contemporary realities, in order to better serve our collective interests.
|
| President Mugabe:
This august Assembly is the most representative organ within the United Nations family. We must therefore dedicate ourselves to finding consensus on measures to revitalise it, so that it fulfils its mandate in accordance with the provisions of the Charter. We wish to reiterate our deep concern that the mandate, powers and jurisdiction of the General Assembly are shrinking as a consequence of the Security Council gradually encroaching upon the Assembly’s areas of competence. This, in our view, upsets the delicate balance envisaged under the Charter, and undermines the overall effectiveness of the United Nations system. The General Assembly must remain the main deliberative, policy-making organ of the United Nations.
|
The Alternative Speech:
This august Parliament is the most representative organ within the State. We must therefore dedicate ourselves to finding consensus on measures to revitalise it, so that it fulfils its mandate in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution. We wish to reiterate our deep concern that the mandate, powers and jurisdiction of Parliament are shrinking as a consequence of the Government gradually encroaching upon the Parliament’s areas of competence. This, in our view, upsets the delicate balance envisaged under the Constitution, and undermines the overall effectiveness of the State system. Parliament must remain the main deliberative, law-making organ of the State.
|
| President Mugabe:
For how long, Mr President, will the international community continue to ignore the aspirations of a whole continent of fifty-four countries? We shall not be bought-off with empty promises, nor shall we accept some cosmetic tinkering of the Security Council disguised as reform.
|
The Alternative Speech:
For how long, Mr President, will the Government continue to ignore the aspirations of a whole nation of 13 million people? We shall not be bought-off with empty promises, nor shall we accept some cosmetic tinkering of the Constitution disguised as reform.
|
The point is that while the President tries to make all the right noises for the small boys on the world stage, it is useful to pause and reflect upon the fact that there are also small boys on the national stage who feel exactly the same way about him and his party and try to make the right noises for the small people on the national stage. When his Prime Minister complains about unilateralism in the appointment of Governors, Police and Military Commanders; when Welshman Ncube complains about being sidelined in the meetings of GPA Principals – they are the small boys who also feel ignored and harassed by the big boy on the national stage. When ZANU PF arrogantly struts on the national stage and insists on wholesale and unreasonable changes to the draft Constitution simply to suit its own views, it is the same arrogance that the President accuses the big boys on the international stage.
If he can listen to his speech as if it were spoken on the national stage by one of his partners, and if he can do what he exhorts his counterparts on the international stage to do, then Zimbabwe could be in a much better place.
waMagaisa
wamagaisa@gmail.com
Reflections on a Trump presidency: Implications for Africa?